Popular Articles
Burdock Root

Advances In Genomic Medicine Will Mean Massive Changes For The NHS It Is Now Time To Prepare For Them - Lords Science Committee
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee has published a report on Genomic Medicine which argues that recent developments in genomic science stemming from the sequencing of the human genome represent a unique opportunity for real advances in medical care and that the Government and the NHS must take a range of steps to ensure that these advances are realised.
generic viagra online
Texas Lawmakers Divert Millions From Family Planning Clinics To Community Health Centers
Specialty clinics that provide family planning services in Texas have seen a significant decrease in state funding over the past four years because lawmakers have redirected millions of dollars to expand family planning at community health centers, the Dallas Morning News reports. The funding changes began in 2005, when lawmakers said they were shifting funding to community health centers because they offered more comprehensive health care to low-income patients. Advocates for the family planning clinics argue that the policy is an attempt by antiabortion-rights advocates to shut the clinics down. Although clinics that receive state funding are prohibited from offering abortion services, some conservative lawmakers believe that limiting the funding will hurt groups like Planned Parenthood, which offers abortion services at other locations, according to some family planning advocates. The Morning News reports that state lawmakers might return some of the funding to the specialty clinics during the current legislative session; however, the funding only would equal any money left unused by the community health centers.The most significant funding change occurred in 2005, when almost 25% of the state"s $45 million annual family planning budget was set aside for "federally qualified health centers" -- community health centers that offer services to uninsured and underserved people. Advocates for family planning clinics say that the number of patients receiving state-funded reproductive services declined by nearly 22%, from 326,000 patients in 2005 to 255,000 in the last fiscal year. They also note that the community health centers have an unused surplus of more than $11.5 million since 2005, which they say the family planning clinics could have used.According to the Morning News, many public health experts believe that specialty clinics that have family planning services offer more efficient and effective reproductive care than community health centers. David Warner, a health care finance and policy expert at the University of Texas Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, said the specialty clinics are "very targeted" and "don"t have a lot of overhead," whereas the community clinics have "limited enrollment and can be a lot less accessible." He added, "Continuing to starve those clinics means that you"re not going to be reaching the number of people you could be reaching with family planning services." Family planning clinics in Texas offer more than a dozen services ranging from birth control prescriptions to breast and cervical cancer screening and sexually transmitted infection testing. However, reproductive health advocates say many people often associate the clinics with abortion services, which gives antiabortion-rights lawmakers an incentive to shut down the clinics by withholding funding. Fran Hagerty, CEO of the Women"s Health and Family Planning Association of Texas, said, "Some lawmakers believe if they can prevent Planned Parenthood from participating in the state"s family planning program, then they"ve accomplished their goal."Supporters of community health centers say that billing issues and other administrative problems have distorted their data on how many reproductive health patients they are treating. Many women receive care at the community centers for family planning services along with treatment of other health problems, so they often are not recorded as reproductive health patients, according to the centers (Ramshaw, Dallas Morning News, 5/22).
News of the day
New Data Supports Significant Economic And Clinical Value Of MENOPUR(R) In IVF
New data from an economic analysis presented today at this year"s European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) congress showed that, within the parameters of the simulation model used, the in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment MENOPUR (highly-purified human menopausal gonatropin or HP-hMG) offered considerable cost-savings over recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH).1 The cost-effectiveness of HP-hMG compared with rFSH suggested by this data could make it a more attractive choice for use in infertility treatment within a fixed healthcare budget.
Mental Health

BIO Commends Senate Committee On Small Business And Entrepreneurship's SBIR Reauthorization

Under legislation reported by the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, small companies that receive the majority of their financing from venture capital will once again be considered eligible to compete for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grants. The change will allow more small biotechnology start-ups to compete for these funds and continue critical research and development of medical advancements and breakthroughs. Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) President and CEO Jim Greenwood made the following statement today: "For six years, more than half of all small private U.S. biotech companies have not been allowed to compete for SBIR grants due to a bureaucratic ruling. Especially in these troubling economic times, these federal grants could provide considerable support for small companies and the patients awaiting development of new therapies. "I commend the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Chairwoman Mary Landrieu, and Ranking Member Olympia Snowe on their hard work to move this process forward. This legislation provides the opportunity for biotech companies to compete on the promise of their science rather than how they are financed. Over 90 percent of the biotech industry is comprised of small businesses engaged in high risk, high reward research and development that benefits us all. "I urge Congress and the Administration to reauthorize the SBIR program as soon as possible in a way that provides a level playing field for all small companies, regardless of their capital structure. I look forward to working with Members of the House and Senate to modernize the SBIR program to reflect the business realities facing small companies in capital-intensive industries, such as biotechnology. And to do so in a way that does not artificially limit the participation of some of our nation"s most innovative and promising small businesses." As a result of the Small Business Administration (SBA)"s reinterpretation of the program"s eligibility requirements in 2003, the applicant pool at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for SBIR grants has been shrinking. For example, when they became ineligible for SBIR grants, several small biotech firms stopped their work aimed at developing new treatments for cancer and cystic fibrosis. Two years later, NIH Director Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D. told the SBA that limits on SBIR eligibility, "unduly restrict the ability of the NIH to fund high quality, small companies." He expressed concern that the eligibility requirement "undermines NIH"s ability to award SBIR funds to those applicants whom we believe are most likely to improve human health." Patient advocacy groups also have expressed concern about the eligibility restrictions. Sixty patient groups sent a letter to leaders of the 110th Congress in support of reinstating the eligibility of small biotech firms to compete for SBIR grants. In the letter, they asked Congress to "help innovative research move forward in order to foster breakthrough cures. See BIO"s web site and SBIR blog at http://www.hopesandcures.org. BIO


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):